RPC Authority

This was article was pretty unfunny for me.

I’d be very surprised if it stays on the site for long given how you need neccesary context to understand it that most people won’t have.

This is a poor attempt at satirical writing.

I know the context for this, and did not laugh once. 1/5

It seems like the article is trying to be a serious rpc and a joke rpc at the same time

1/5

I found this thoroughly entertaining and humorous though I do not expect future readers who lack the necessary context to agree with me on this. Five stars while it lasts.

This article is a period piece that, as a unit of culture, rightfully belongs in the J section. Regardless of a given users opinion of the source material, the article is "well" written and covers a legitimate moral dispute.

Yes, this is a context sensitive piece. I understood the context, and gave it a +4.

I just want to bring up a counterpoint to all of the people saying that this doesn't work because context is required, remember that RPC-807-J exists too. While RPC-807-J is making reference to a far larger scale event (pretty much everyone at the time knew about the raiders), it still is a completely context-sensitive piece. We don't even use the upvote/downvote system anymore. And it's well recieved¹.

Of course, the writing quality between the two may differ to readers, and other shit like that. But yeah, that's just my opinion.

Truly. A well made masterpiece good sir.

I think that having articles that directly target a specific user are just.. poor. Along with that, this doesn't really seem like it was done as a joke, as much as it was done due to anger poorly-disguised as an attempt at comedy.