I agree. Might have been much better if that part was a separate interview.
To be honest, the whole first interview should have been separated into more than three parts. Way too much information went back and forth while the agent and Ms. Earhart just met like 3 minutes before. Simply it might not make sense.
Also, I think changing Interview-187-A-1 to Addendum-1 or something like that would make the article more professional. Designations should remain consistent.
Overall, the concept was good, and there is a definite potential for this to become a decent storytelling rpc, but for now the plot and its development is a bit awkward.
2/5. I'm sorry.