Could you put a description of the female and her age
RPC-016 / Discussion
Forum
» Hidden / Per page discussions
» RPC-016
This is the discussion related to the wiki page RPC-016.
Necroposting, but why do you need this information?
blabbo
This is really well done! You should add the colors of the balls though.
Them being made of Steel should have tipped it off, but I was planning on adding an image today before I did anything else, so there ya go!
Does the SPC regenerate once it’s been used? Does it get used up or can it be used again upon death of the subject? This should have been answered in the description.
I thought I made it clear that it stays in a body until that person dies, and then someone else can pick it up.
I like it. It's well written and the concept is fascinating
Maybe the RPC Authority will reverse engineer these to form a specialized task force?
I'd like to avoid doing that sort of thing with my RPCs, personally I'm of the mindset that if you start letting things out of their boxes and cells, eventually you're going to make a mistake, and cause a true containment breach.
(account deleted)Good article, but I'm curious as to why their instructing the D-class to form weapons, which seems like a pretty big mistake to me. Wouldn't they want the D-Class to make harmless objects instead?
The researcher in charge wasn't certain if it could make anything other than weapons, given the recovery notes, so he focused on what he knew first.
Good article, me and my S.O. started a Site-2 reading binge and we enjoyed this article in particular. I wonder if the 'Revolution' spoken of will be a GOI to be explored in future articles.
Really just a nitpick, but the image having just an empty white background really bothers me. It's very clear it's just a stock image. Also, I think the girl holding RPC-016-5 should have some sort of name to go by (and not an actual name, just a designation of some sort). And on that topic, there are a few points where she is referred to as RPC-016-5, but most of the time it refers to the ball itself, as it should (since RPC-016-1 though -4 designate the balls as well). Also, instead of following the naming scheme for MSTs, you make mention of a "Mobile Task Force 05". Otherwise, the article is quite good, I like the "request log" in particular. Just a few things I take issue with.
It seems like the female is being described in a non-clinical tone.
RPC-016-5 is currently held by a young, blonde, white female, age ██, recovered along with RPC-016.
RPC-016-5 is currently held by a Caucasian female aged ██, and was recovered alongside RPC-016.
or
RPC-016-5 is currently held by a Caucasian female of [insert nation here] descent measuring [numbers]cm and [numbers]kg. RPC-016-5 was recovered alongside RPC-016.
3 now, 4 if this gets patched. Yes, this is that much of an eyesore.
/forum/t-6204211/rpc-016#post-