I'm fairly certain that "dead pixels" would mean that the printer's effect is doing permanent damage to the computer's monitor.
The horror is superbly delivered with this description and the images you used, hats down to you.
bruh I think you mean hats off
bruh
blabbo
I would have a subtitle below your last picture, otherwise interesting idea.
Good concept, but it needs edits to fix formatting and tone issues. Those redactions could also stand to be filled in.
Great use of multimedia, genuinely unsettling and composed well.
Such is life in the Soviet Union
As a Nitpicking Guy I recognize it's my duty to first point out that the writing in this article is all over the place. There are comma splices everywhere, lots of "described as" and run-on sentences, and it just generally has a weird tone and arrangement. The thing is, though, that's far from the only thing wrong with this article.
The anomaly described in this article is simply baffling to me. There are so many layers that don't seem to gel cohesively with one another. I think this is partially to blame for the scatterbrained feel of the article. There's also arbitrary censorship, which is never fun. Of the four redactions in the article, two of them are used to cover up details which I can only presume the author couldn't be assed to think about. Then there's this one:
This creates a loud noise described by Class-E personnel as [REDACTED].
I have no idea why you would redact this; it changes nothing and just makes the article feel lazier. This article also invokes the unfortunate "unnecessary discovery log", with a small dose of "amnesiacs" for good measure. (Why do I keep seeing that in old articles? This is 2018 RPC, not 2008 SCP, right?)
I find the general idea somewhat interesting, and the intriguingly horrific death details at the end hint that there's a competent, enjoyable article hidden inside. But make no mistake, this article is incredibly subpar in its current state. 2/5
Yeah I wrote and made all this in about an hour or two back when the site needed some starting content, I'm an artist not necessarily a writer. But damn.
Of course I could certainly stand to come back and give it some improvements. Despite your… Enthusiasm, I'll certainly take your critique into mind for a few changes.
EDIT: I'll admit you were definitely right, this was pretty poorly written and I'll give it a rewrite to spruce it up a bit.
The article has a good base, with the strongest point being the message behind it, which I am unsure whether it is unintentional or not. The message being the guilt you get from taking someone's life, shown through the properties of guilt upon activating the anomaly and the indirect taking of your own life by the literal ghosts that manifested after the victim's death.
The concept is present, but unexplored so I am skeptical whether it was initially intentional - the fact that the guilt upon activation was added AFTER the article's initial publication is further proof. Which mind you, it's not that much of a problem by itself but it's difficult for readers to agree what the quality of the article is as it keeps changing with each comment.
Yeah I rewrote the bulk of it last year, I never really wrote anything like it before so it was a bit of a mess. I'm an artist rather than a writer, so hopefully it's in a better spot now.